Saturday, January 5, 2013

Feliz Año Nuevo

Native dancers enter the tent at the October 2012 Sacred Springs Powwow in San Marcos, Texas
Dancers enter the tent at the October 2012 Sacred Springs Powwow. Copyright Collin French.
One of my New Years resolutions is to better cultivate my social media personae through this blog, Twitter, etc. Since it's the fifth of January, and I'm just now posting my Happy New Year post, I'm not doing so well already. Nevertheless, I wanted to ring in 2013 with something of an homage, for me, to the Winter Solstice 2012.

By now the general excitement over the Mayan calendar and December 21st, 2012 has waned, though I still hear occasional jokes and announcements of Protestant seminars on the idolatry of prophecy. That a group, lumped together in popular terms as "the Mayans," has become the butt of a joke that the white media feel entitled to tell both sickens and saddens me. Apparently, it's OK to tell racist jokes if you believe the race in question is "extinct" (see image below).


It's comments like this that demonstrate how much we all depend on broadening education about Indigenous Peoples of the Americas. I've been blessed to work with the Indigenous Cultures Institute of San Marcos, Texas, the primary mission of which is precisely to educate, for about four years now. Though I volunteer in whatever way I can, my primary role is that of managing editor for the online scholarly journal Nakum. "Nakum" is a Coahuiltecan word that means "I/we speak to you," and the mission of the journal is to provide a space and a forum for Native and Chicana/o Peoples to speak to the world at large about the issues and creative paths that interest our communities.

Here I am at the admissions table for ICI's Sacred Springs Powwow in San Marcos, Tx in October, 2012. Copyright Collin French
This year we had the great fortune to release print copies of our first two issues. And, as of December 21st, 2012, we have published our third--and strongest-- issue. Check out Nakum 2012! This issue in particular is so important for all of us at ICI because it debunks the popular assumption undergirding the excitement and subsequent disappointment surrounding 2012: that Indigenous knowledge is exclusively spiritual rather than scientific or academic.

As El Paso native and author of Nine Seasons: Beyond 2012, Carlos Aceves points out in his introduction to the issue, the end of this Bakhtun reveals the scope of Amerindigenous knowledge and cosmology. The Mayan calendar records the fact that ancient Peoples not only kept astonishingly accurate astrophysical data, but they also recognized the relationships of cosmological phenomena to the mundane physical world they inhabited and continue to inhabit. That it's easier for the Western mind to believe in the possibility of a Mayan spiritual prophecy than in the precise data-collecting, scientific capabilities, and interpretive powers of Indigenous people says more about Western society than it ever will about Native people themselves.

Enter Nakum to provide a space for contemporary Indigenous voices and intellectual and creative work. Check out our 2012 issue and let us know what you think.

Feliz 2013!







I love images of Native people in ceremonial and/or traditional regalia or clothing with the indigenization of some contemporary fashion statement. In this case, I'm loving the Chuck Taylors on this young dancer. Copyright Collin French.


My son, in the Longhorns hoodie, with traditional dancer. Copyright Collin French.

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Heritage

At the Houston Public Library's "Librofest," September 15th, 2012 Copyright Collin French


Yesterday marked the end of Hispanic heritage month, though much of the mid-September fanfare has diminished in recent weeks to make way for breast cancer awareness. (For those of us who are Hispanic, Black, or Native or for those whose lives have been touched by cancer of any sort, these token months of awareness serve as reminders that every month, indeed every day, should really recognize and memorialize the lives, histories, and legacies of those women and men who have built and strengthened the communities we may sometimes take for granted today.) I had intended to use the blog to track some of the events I attended this month, but, to be honest, I just didn't make time. But I've also been consumed with some identity questions this month, so I thought I would post today about them.

Usually, Hispanic heritage month and the days and weeks leading up to el dia de los muertos and into the Christmas holidays get me thinking about mis antepasados, about who they were and what kind of lives they led, about how they may have informed who I have become. In recent years, I've thought with pride about my tía, Auntie Gogo, and her strength, the tenacity of her faith and of her traditions. She always represented for me the archetype of my family's mexicanidad as she struggled, it seemed, to keep us anchored to our heritage, to our language, to our religious faith. I've wondered about the tíos I never knew, those who passed before I was born or when I was too young to remember. And I've actively sought out information about the early ones, the CdeBacas who first settled in New Mexico.

But those quests usually inspire more guilt than pride. According to Fray Angelico Chavez's Origins of New Mexico Families in the Spanish Colonial Period, for instance, one of my ancestors, a second- or third-generation Nuevo Mexicano whose own ancestors had migrated from Mexico City, was jailed for offenses against the Pueblo Indians in and around the settlement. As an activist-scholar in American Indian and Indigenous studies, I was troubled by this news although not entirely surprised.

In my family there is a long and storied history of internalized racism predicated on the always-shifting ground of racial and ethnic markers and definitions, the risk that proud "Spaniards" will be mistaken for Mexicanos (which means "indios" or "mestizos") instead of whites. Discursive histories of Hispanic ethnic identification--from the articles of citizenship in the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo to the 2010 Census--recur in the stories that circulate in my family. So much so that there remains a remarkable disparity between the oral history of settlement passed down from my great-grandmother (my little grandma, mi abuelita) to my mother on one hand and that represented in Fray Chavez's brief history. The cuentos say we arrived in the 1800s, from Spain, pure-blooded; the historia shows a genealogical migration from Mexico City, wherein, in the 1700s, blood discourse was fraught at best.

From my own personal history, I realized relatively late--in graduate school, in fact--that my mother's attempts to pass me off as white constituted a form of protection. She betrayed in the act of passing her children off as white, her own keen acknowledgment of racial and ethnic hierarchies in this nation and of the opportunities afforded to the privileged and denied to the under-classes. She sought to save my siblings and me from ever having to question our social positions.

It didn't work.

This Hispanic heritage month, I found myself thinking less about mis antepasados and more about my present and future. I found myself wondering how I model a particular negotiation of heritage for my own children and whether my efforts to retain in our lives and home that proud sense of our mexicanidad is understood by my (Southern white) husband and my sons. When, for instance, I speak Spanish in the home or when I'm belting out some Lola Beltrán or Los Tigres del Norte tune, my five-year-old knows that he can get a rise out of me by saying petulantly, "Why are you doing that? We're not even Mexican." This question and statement always saddens me more than it irritates me because it belies his nascent understanding of the still entrenched cultural and social structures, especially the aural markers of voice, language, accent, and music and the visual markers of skin color, from which my mother sought to protect me.

It saddens me because I fear that my attempts at re-integrating that heritage from which I was actively shielded comes across as tokenistic--like Hispanic heritage month. Because own education in and recognition of the value of my cultural heritage arrived late, I present for m'hijo what appears to me at this moment a neatly wrapped package of mariachis, lotería, y tacos, of dia de los muertos y Cinco de Mayo. It feels reductive, oversimplified, watered down--in a word, whitewashed. I feel like a little girl trying to stem the enormous tide of what Chicana activist Cherríe Moraga called "the whitening of a generation."

But it has also been Moraga's articulation of her own negotiations with her mexicanidad that has given me hope. Like Moraga, I strive to cultivate an ethos of listening that allows me not to run from the sins of my ancestors (I've read enough Faulkner to know that's impossible) but instead to own up to them and actively refuse to participate in the kinds of non-listening their sense of power and privilege--however fraught and manufactured--engendered. For me this means actively releasing the hold that the ideology of melting-pot assimilation has had on my family for generations. It means dismantling the logic of cultural assimilation that stipulates that mixed children will necessarily, inevitably, be more American than anything else, or at any rate, than what comes before the hyphen. It means disavowing the cultural value of assimilation in favor of a Mexicanization of our américan lives.

Thus, I have hope that when my son begins his own reconciliation with his heritage he'll remember the many CMAS events he has attended alongside the mariachis at Houston Public Library's Librofest, which kicked off Hispanic heritage month for us this year; that he'll remember the warmth, generosity of spirit, and activism of our friends at the Indigenous Cultures Institute alongside the dia de los muertos calacas we made following the design of visiting artist, Laura Lopez Cano earlier in the month; that he'll remember the play dates with the children at Austin's Posada Esperanza while I was teaching their mothers English; that he'll remember his mother's protests for immigrants' rights and against cutting funding to ethnic studies at UT. In short, I hope that for my sons Hispanic Heritage signifies more than a month of cultural programming; I hope that I can instill in them pride in their own Chican@ heritage, a celebration of the political struggles as well as the cultural value of our People.

Saturday, September 15, 2012

Updates

In January of 2012 I moved to Houston after accepting a faculty position at Houston Community College - Central. To say that the ensuing six months were packed is more than an understatement; it's down-right hyperbole. In addition to the new job - a perfect fit, incidentally - I gave birth to my second son in April (3 weeks early and 1 week before classes ended!) and bought my first house in a cute little barrio between Houston and Katy.

I'm now much more established both at home and at work. This year I'm once again focusing on my research in sound studies and Chican@ and American Indian literatures and working to expand Mexican American studies at HCC.

This blog serves to track developments and musings on these last two projects in particular.

Thursday, October 13, 2011

"Athens Only Once"

1) Consensus of what the chapter is about
-Use what the most appropriate active verb

"In Athens Once", Rodriguez meticulously alludes to an identity confused Tijuana that sits in an indeterminate cultural state between the constant influencing north and its unforgiving homeland.

2) Identify 3 concepts

a) Animosity (Mexico City and American on Tijuana)
b) Religion
c) Mexico as a crowd
d) Tijuana in San Diego/ Tijuana is the new "American Dream"

3) For each concept, 2 representative statements in different discussions

a) pg. 91 -- "American has long imagined itself clean...and vulnerable to the foreign. Aliens are carriers of chaos -- Mexicans are obviously carriers of chaos -- their backs are broken with bundles of it: gray air, brown water, papacy, leprosy, crime, diarrhea, whithe powders, and a language full of newts and cicadas.
pg. 83 -- "Consider Tijuana from Mexico's point of view...People in Mexico City will tell you, if they have anything at all to say about Tijuana, that Tijuana is a city without history, a city without architecture, an American city."
b) pg. 88 -- "Spanish Catholicism bequeathed to Mexico an assumption of Original Sin. Much in life is failure or compromse. The knowledge has left Mexico patient as a desert, and tolerant of corruptions that have played upon her surface."
pg. 90 -- "For Mexicans, the border is not that right Puritan thing, a line. (Straight lines are unknown in mexico.)
c) pg. 81 -- "The point of Mexico is the crowd. Whatever happens in Tijuana, I caution myself, do not imagine you have been singled out. You have entered into the million."
pg. 96 -- "Because Mexico is brown and I am brown, I fear being lost in Mexico. When I get out of the cab, I am in a crowd."
d) pg. 92 -- "Californians use Mexico as an opposite planet."
pg. 87 -- "We are a generation removed from that other city, the city generations of American men mispronounced as "Tee-ah-wanna," by which hey named an alter-ego American city, a succubus that could take them about as far as they wanted to go. [...] When boxing was illegal in San Diego, there was blood sport in Tijuana. There were whores and there was gambling and there was drink."

4) Discern how each concept relates to one another and how they all work to support the overall topic.

There is a clear division between San Diego and Tijuana established in this chapter. However, Rodriguez claims that together, Tijuana and San Diego are "one city," and there is no doubt that Tijuana exists in San Diego. Mexico attracts a crowd of Americans because of the religious tolerance of the Catholic faith for alcohol, prostitution, and any other thing outlawed in the U.S. In fact, Tijuana has become the newly renovated "American Dream" where one is able to unleash guilty pleasures. Rodriguez sheds light on the fact that this causes animosity towards Tijuana from both Mexico and the U.S. Tijuana is seemed as dirty and filthy from an American perspective and Mexico views Tijuana as a lost city to America for it being a city "without history, a city without architecture, an American city." Rodriguez uses all four of these concepts to support the modernity of Tijuana. According to Rodriguez, Tijuana may have lost its appeal to Mexico, but has changed with the influence that San Diego has had on the city of Tijuana.

Chapter 2: Late Victorians

In chapter two of Days of Obligation, Richard Rodriguez unearths the early comedies and later tragedies of gay San Francisco.

Concepts:
  • Ends, mortality
  • youth
  • art, artifice, "taste"
  • absence
  • architecture
  • cities
  • family, domesticity 



California's need for Connection to the past


Overall Concept of ch. 5 : ironically contrasts how peoples romanticized perception of Missions in CA with how the missions actually were

1. Irony:

"The same year that Spain purged the foreign from itself, Spain set sail to convert the world." 114

Members must be native born Californians-an odd requirement insofar as the men and women who built California were born elsewhere."122

2. Romance/ imaginative idea of history:

"Tourists come in spite of the religious aspect of the missions. Indeed, the missions are picturesque; they are romantic; they lure the Californian off the freeway for being so different - seeming so pristine - amidst the ancient ruins of twentieth-century California." – 124

"San Jose is the most recently restored of the missions... rebuilt from the ground up - a complete fake. And, for that, probably the nearest approach to the past." - 130

3. Father/ Adam Figure:

“ Father Serra is an authentic pun in California –Father of the state –civilizer, tamer of savages, planter of shade.”-111

“Father Serra can play two parts in a tragedy of California. If he is the first Lost Man, the perceivable Adam, he is well the Angel of the Fiery Sword, forbidding Eden.” -117

4. Importance of Remembrance:

“It reminds me of freeways being built in California; it reminds me of my faith in the future. My nostalgia is for a time when I felt myself free of nostalgia.”-120

“What sorrowing Daughter could not abide was the leveling shrug of a state that honors only the future. Such a state condemned her parents to oblivion.” -123

Connections of Concepts to overall concept of Chapter:

The overarching theme of the chapter is that California, being relatively new, is burdened with the urge to connect itself to the past, even if this means having a broken, self-gratifying understanding of what the past actually contains. For example, the San Jose mission had to be rebuilt and is composed of none of the original masonry, but is still used as a link to the past just to have something. The text has various examples of the ironies that crop up as a result of this need for a historical connection that isn’t really there. Father Serra is prominent because California needed to have it’s own idol. Like the reporters that the archivist complains of, California needs an imagined connection to history, and doesn’t require accuracy.

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Mexico's Children



Meaning of chapter: Rodriguez sardonically examines the public and private self of Mexicans in an American Diaspora.



Concepts:
1. Parenthood (mother vs. father/male vs. female) America = Adopting vs. Mexico parenthood

  • Passage 1: "Mexico, mad mother. She still does not know what to make of our leaving. For most of the century Mexico has seen her children flee from the house of memory." Pg. 52
  • Passage 2: "Mexico worries about her own. What influence shall she have? The village is international now...Mexico cannot hold the attention of her children." Pg. 73


2. Private vs. Public Self (Tu vs. Usted) pg. 54, 63, and 68 passages

  • Passage 1: "At the heart there is tu---the intimate voice---the familiar room in a world full of rooms," ... "Usted, the formal, the bloodless, the ornamental you, is spoken to the eyes of strangers." Pg. 54
  • Passage 2: "Mexicans have invaded American privacy to babysit or to watch the dying or to wash lipstick off the cocktail glasses...The Southwest is besotted with the culture of tu."


3. Memory and Language

  • Passage 1:"What is the prognosis for a memory in a country so young? For Mexico is memory...." Pg. 73
  • Passage 2: "At the end of the week, the tabernacle of memory is dismantled, distributed among the villagers in their vans, and carried out of Mexico." Pg. 79


4. Diaspora/Migration (America/immigrating vs. Mexico/emigrating or [Mexico as an archtransvestite pg. 61]

  • Passage 1: "Like wandering Jews, Mexicans had no true home but the tabernacle of memory." pg. 48
  • Passage 2: "Mexicans live in superstitious fear of the American diaspora...In it's male in it's public, in its city aspect, Mexico is an archtransvestite, a tragic buffoon." Pg. 61 (Archtransvestite: "The arch-transvestite personifies the trajectory of a group of transsexuals in Brazil: usually expelled from home or rejected by their families at a young age, they are practically forced into prostitution as the only form of livelihood." [Via Encontros da imagem 2011.] Mexico has expelled its children and forced them to "prostitute themselves to the gringo."

The concepts relate to one another and work to support the overall topic.


Through the use of words like tu and usted, Rodriguez introduces the private and public self of the Mexican emmigrant and the Mexican immigrant and the way they affect and interact with the American southwest. When talking about migrations affecting the way Mexicans imagine themselves in a new land, Mexicans associates memory with the Mexican mother land and that memory becomes the imagined home/diaspora of Mexican Americans.


Themes: Relating to Mexico

Female

Vs.

Male

Intimate/Private

Vs.

Public

Mother

Vs.

Father

Tu

Vs.

Usted

Spanish

Vs.

English

Village

Vs.

City


Other Themes:


* Immigrating Vs. Emigrating
* Present Vs. Memory